CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
LOW

CVE-2022-3333

CVE-2022-3333 — Zephyr Project Manager REST Call cross site scripting

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Zephyr Project Manager up to 3.2.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /v1/tasks/create/ of the component REST Call Handler. The manipulation of the argument onanimationstart leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.2.5 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-209370 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulDB

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

zephyr

project_manager

CVSS base

3.5

LOW

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

zephyr

Products (1)

project manager

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
3.5CVSS 3.1LOW——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-707

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /v1/tasks/create/.

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • zephyrevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-707other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.