CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-1116

CVE-2026-1116 — Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in parisneo/lollms

A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the `from_dict` method of the `AppLollmsMessage` class in parisneo/lollms prior to version 2.2.0. The vulnerability arises from the lack of sanitization or HTML encoding of the `content` field when deserializing user-provided data. This allows an attacker to inject malicious HTML or JavaScript payloads, which can be executed in the context of another user's browser. Exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to account takeover, session hijacking, or wormable attacks.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, @huntr_ai

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

parisneo

parisneo_lollms

CVSS base

8.2

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

parisneo

Products (1)

parisneo lollms

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.0HIGH——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /lollms.

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • parisneoevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-79other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.