CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-47380

CVE-2026-47380 — NocoDB: User Enumeration via Sign-In Timing

NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.04.1, sign-in response timing differed between known and unknown email addresses because the unknown-user branch returned without performing a password hash comparison. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.04.1.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

nocodb

nocodb

CVSS base

6.3

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

nocodb

Products (1)

nocodb

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
6.3CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-208
  • CWE-307

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1592.002Gather Victim Host Information: Software
  • T1082System Information Discovery
  • T1110.001Brute Force: Password Guessing

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • nocodbevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-208other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.