CVE-2026-5743
CVE-2026-5743 — Mixed Media Gallery Blocks <= 3.3.3.1 - Authenticated (Author+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via sliderMaxHeight Block Attribute
The SimpLy Gallery Block & Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via block attributes in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.3.2. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the sliderMaxHeight block attribute in the pgc_sgb_render_callback() function. The vulnerability exists because the pgc_sgb_sanitize_custom_css() function uses a flawed regex pattern that only removes event handlers with quoted values (e.g., onfocus="alert()") but fails to catch unquoted event handlers (e.g., onfocus=alert(document.cookie)), allowing the malicious code to bypass sanitization. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages via block attributes that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, Wordfence
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
6.4
MEDIUM
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | CVSS 3.1 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-79
References
10 on the record
- www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/29b1984d-e6da-49d5-8b40-cdf2f1bcc1bb?source=cve
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/tags/3.3.2.2/blocks/init.php#L95
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/trunk/blocks/init.php#L95
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/trunk/blocks/init.php#L122
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/tags/3.3.2.2/blocks/init.php#L122
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/trunk/blocks/init.php#L142
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/tags/3.3.2.2/blocks/init.php#L142
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simply-gallery-block/trunk/blocks/init.php#L151
reference
Elsewhere on this site
- gallerycreatorevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-79other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.