
SANS 2025 Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Survey: Navigating Uncertainty in Today’s Threat Landscape
Did you know that 86% of organizations use the MITRE ATT&CK framework to structure their threat intelligence efforts or that 90% rely primarily on external intelligence sources to stay ahead of cyber threats?
These numbers are not only impressive; they signal a paradigm shift in how Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is prioritized and practiced in 2025.
Navigating a Complex Digital Landscape
According to the latest 2025 SANS CTI Survey, sponsored by SOCRadar, organizations globally are reshaping their CTI capabilities to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats. A notable 70.2% of cybersecurity professionals highlight the need for adaptation as digital complexities surge, reflecting the growing pressures from both adversaries and internal digital sprawl.
Evolution of CTI Processes
AI is Not Optional, It’s Essential
Another standout from the survey is that over one-third of organizations now leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) within their CTI workflows. This isn’t just experimentation; it’s becoming a critical part of threat detection and response strategies, from automated data collection to triage and enrichment.
External Inputs Lead the Way
Structured approaches like MITRE ATT&CK™ are no longer optional. With 86% of respondents actively using the framework, it’s clear that the community is aligning around standardized methods to better understand and counter adversary behavior.
Use cases for MITRE ATT&CK
External intelligence sources dominate CTI programs:
- 90% rely on data from vendor feeds, threat-sharing groups, and the open web
- Only 64% utilize internal sources, pointing to a potential area of growth and untapped value
Despite these advancements, CTI teams consistently face hurdles, including:
- Limited resources
- Constantly shifting threats
- Regulatory pressures and compliance demands
Communication is a critical success factor, with 80% of organizations relying primarily on written reports to deliver intelligence. Reports have evolved from simple alerts to strategic tools that influence decisions at the executive level.
Yet, just 55% of CTI programs measure their effectiveness. Most rely on direct stakeholder feedback, so formal ROI tracking and maturity modeling still need improvement.
Methods for Gathering Feedback on CTI
Curious about how leading organizations are overcoming these barriers and driving effective CTI? Explore the complete insights in the detailed 2025 SANS CTI Survey, brought to you in sponsorship of SOCRadar.