CVE-2019-10181
CVE-2019-10181 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
It was found that in icedtea-web up to and including 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 executable code could be injected in a JAR file without compromising the signature verification. An attacker could use this flaw to inject code in a trusted JAR. The code would be executed inside the sandbox.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, redhat
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
6.3
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | CVSS 3.0 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-345
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1557.002Adversary-in-the-Middle: ARP Cache Poisoning
- T1584.002Compromise Infrastructure: DNS Server
- T1491Defacement
References
8 on the record
- github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/pull/344
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/issues/327
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10181
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00045.html
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_SUSE
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00008.html
mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/5
mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/154748/IcedTeaWeb-Validation-Bypass-Directory-Traversal-Code-Execution.html
x_refsource_MISC
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-51
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.