CVE-2022-3065
CVE-2022-3065 — Improper Access Control in jgraph/drawio
Improper Access Control in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 20.2.8.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, @huntrdev
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
5.3
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | CVSS 3.0 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-284
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1027.009Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded Payloads
- T1546.004Event Triggered Execution: .bash_profile and .bashrc
- T1546.016Event Triggered Execution: Installer Packages
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /drawio.
References
2 on the record
- huntr.dev/bounties/5f3bc4b6-1d53-46b7-a23d-70f5faaf0c76
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/jgraph/drawio/commit/59887e45b36f06c8dd4919a32bacd994d9f084da
x_refsource_MISC
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.