CVE-2023-27389
CVE-2023-27389 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
Inadequate encryption strength vulnerability in CONPROSYS IoT Gateway products allows a remote authenticated attacker with an administrative privilege to apply a specially crafted Firmware update file, alter the information, cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition, and/or execute arbitrary code. The affected products and versions are as follows: M2M Gateway with the firmware Ver.3.7.10 and earlier (CPS-MG341-ADSC1-111, CPS-MG341-ADSC1-931, CPS-MG341G-ADSC1-111, CPS-MG341G-ADSC1-930, and CPS-MG341G5-ADSC1-931), M2M Controller Integrated Type with firmware Ver.3.7.6 and earlier versions (CPS-MC341-ADSC1-111, CPS-MC341-ADSC1-931, CPS-MC341-ADSC2-111, CPS-MC341G-ADSC1-110, CPS-MC341Q-ADSC1-111, CPS-MC341-DS1-111, CPS-MC341-DS11-111, CPS-MC341-DS2-911, and CPS-MC341-A1-111), and M2M Controller Configurable Type with firmware Ver.3.8.8 and earlier versions (CPS-MCS341-DS1-111…
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, jpcert
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
7.2
HIGH
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | CVSS 3.1 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-326
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1110Brute Force
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /or.
References
5 on the record
- www.contec.com/api/downloadlogger?download=/-/media/Contec/jp/support/security-info/contec_security_cps_230317_en.pdf
reference
- www.contec.com/download/donwload-list/?itemid=f832c526-dcf6-4976-85aa-f536c15a8120#firmware
reference
- www.contec.com/download/donwload-list/?itemid=a054b3eb-da97-40d0-9598-d7f5ff4239ec#firmware
reference
- www.contec.com/download/donwload-list/?itemid=a1b33f0d-d32b-4549-9741-613cd37d5528#firmware
reference
- jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU96198617/
reference
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.