CVE-2024-58289 — Microweber 2.0.15 Stored Cross-Site Scripting via User Profile Fields

Microweber 2.0.15 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts into user profile fields. Attackers can input script payloads in the first name field that will execute when the profile is viewed by other users, potentially stealing session cookies and executing arbitrary JavaScript.

Published Dec 11, 2025Updated Apr 7, 2026Sources: cvelistV5, VulnCheck

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

microweber

CVSS base

5.3

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

microweber

Products (1)

microweber

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
5.3	CVSS 4.0	MEDIUM	—	—	cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-79

References

4 on the record

www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52058
exploit
microweber.me/
product
github.com/microweber/microweber
product
www.vulncheck.com/advisories/microweber-stored-cross-site-scripting-via-user-profile-fields
third-party-advisory

Elsewhere on this site

microweberevery CVE for this vendor
CWE-79other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.