CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2025-41393

CVE-2025-41393 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence

Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in the laser printers and MFPs (multifunction printers) which implement Ricoh Web Image Monitor. If exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user who accessed Web Image Monitor. As for the details of affected product names and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendors under [References].

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, jpcert

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

1%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

ricoh company

2 products listed

CVSS base

5.1

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Products (2)

multiple laser printers and mfps which implement web image monitormultiple mfps which implement web image monitor

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.