CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalInjectionpublic exploit

CVE-2025-57819

CVE-2025-57819 — FreePBX Affected by Authentication Bypass Leading to SQL Injection and RCE

FreePBX is an open-source web-based graphical user interface. FreePBX 15, 16, and 17 endpoints are vulnerable due to insufficiently sanitized user-supplied data allowing unauthenticated access to FreePBX Administrator leading to arbitrary database manipulation and remote code execution. This issue has been patched in endpoint versions 15.0.66, 16.0.89, and 17.0.3.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, FreePBX (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Aug 29, 2025

EPSS

88%

ahead of 99.8% of scored CVEs

Affects

FreePBX

3 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade endpoint to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline Sep 19, 2025 — passed 360 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
FreePBXendpoint< 15.0.66Vulnerable
FreePBXendpoint< 16.0.89Vulnerable
FreePBXendpoint< 17.0.3Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1critical3.95.9NVD
10CVSS 4.0criticalFreePBX (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-288 · Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

  • Bypass Protection Mechanism::

Mitigation: Funnel all access through a single choke point to simplify how users can access a resource. For every access, perform a check to determine if the user has permissions to access the resource.::

CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

  • Read Application Data
  • Bypass Protection Mechanism
  • Modify Application Data

Mitigation: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-89SQL Injection
  • CWE-288Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-470 · Expanding Control over the Operating System from the DatabaseCAPEC-109 · Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-110 · SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-7 · Blind SQL InjectionCAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-66 · SQL Injection
  • T1083File and Directory Discovery
  • T1211Exploitation for Defensive Evasion
  • T1542.002Pre-OS Boot: Component Firmware

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Aug 29, 2025

Federal deadline

Sep 19, 2025

passed 360 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

28

4 of the 5 sampled are weaponized

Exploit entries

14

Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable endpoint.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 42 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPSdatabase audit logs

Groups associated with this CVE

Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Cve is exploited TeteREN/CVE-2025-57819-RCE

    Aug 12, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  3. Cve is exploited Neobee714/CVE-2025-57819-POC

    Jul 20, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  4. Cve is exploited Its1Zero/cve-2025-57819-exploit

    Jul 2, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  5. Cve is exploited JazzTheRabbit/FreePBX-SQLi-RCE

    Jun 27, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  6. Cve is exploited ozcanpng/CVE-2025-57819-FreePBX-RCE2Root

    Jun 19, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  7. Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)

    Jun 17, 2026 · NVD

  8. Cve is exploited b4sh2/CVE-2025-57819-poc

    Jun 7, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  9. Cve is exploited Jeanback1/CVE-2025-57819-exploit

    Jun 7, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  10. 2025
  11. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Aug 29, 2025 · CISA

  12. Initial · CVE published

    Aug 28, 2025 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

  • 13×Github ReposJun 6, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 13×SVRS was changedJun 7, 2026 – Jul 20, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • Tweets · 1 time tweeted.Jun 10, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

5 on the record

Coverage

18 stories from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-57819 is FreePBX Affected by Authentication Bypass Leading to SQL Injection and RCE, a critical vulnerability affecting endpoint from FreePBX. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 42 public PoC repositories reported; 4 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 88% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.