CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalInjectionpublic exploit

CVE-2025-58360

CVE-2025-58360 — GeoServer is vulnerable to an Unauthenticated XML External Entities (XXE) attack via WMS GetMap feature

GeoServer is an open source server that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. From version 2.26.0 to before 2.26.2 and before 2.25.6, an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability was identified. The application accepts XML input through a specific endpoint /geoserver/wms operation GetMap. However, this input is not sufficiently sanitized or restricted, allowing an attacker to define external entities within the XML request. This issue has been patched in GeoServer 2.25.6, GeoServer 2.26.3, and GeoServer 2.27.0.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, geoserver (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Dec 11, 2025

EPSS

65%

ahead of 99.2% of scored CVEs

Affects

geoserver

2 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade geoserver to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline Jan 1, 2026 — passed 258 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
geoservergeoserver>= 2.26.0, < 2.26.2Vulnerable
geoservergeoserver< 2.25.6Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1high3.94.2GitHub (CNA), geoserver (CNA)
9.8CVSS 3.1critical3.95.9NVD

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-611 · Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference

  • Read Application Data
  • Read Files or Directories
  • Bypass Protection Mechanism
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)

Mitigation: Many XML parsers and validators can be configured to disable external entity expansion.::

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-611XML External Entity Reference

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-221 · Data Serialization External Entities Blowup

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Dec 11, 2025

Federal deadline

Jan 1, 2026

passed 258 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

9

1 of the 5 sampled are weaponized

Exploit entries

1

Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /geoserver/wms.
  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable geoserver.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 10 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPSdatabase audit logs

Groups associated with this CVE

Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.

Shadow NetworkOperation HarvestOperation Shadow ForceInfyMana Team

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)

    Jun 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. 2025
  4. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Dec 11, 2025 · CISA

  5. Initial · CVE published

    Nov 25, 2025 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

  • 16×SVRS was changedJan 12, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 13×TweetsJan 27, 2026 – May 26, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • Github_Repos · Github repository created, thomas-osgood/cve-2025-58360Feb 2, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

5 on the record

Coverage

13 stories from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-58360 is GeoServer is vulnerable to an Unauthenticated XML External Entities (XXE) attack via WMS GetMap feature, a critical vulnerability affecting geoserver from geoserver. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 10 public PoC repositories reported; 1 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 65% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.