CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-15810

CVE-2026-15810 — Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Looker allows Admin Account Takeover

A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Google Cloud Looker versions prior to 25.6.103, 25.12.65, 25.18.68, 26.0.66, 26.2.47, 26.4.36, 26.6.28, and 26.8.7 on Looker-hosted and Self-hosted allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript leading to administrative account takeover using a maliciously crafted URL. Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable. This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances. No user action is required for these. Self-hosted instances must be upgraded to the patched versions: 25.6.103+, 25.12.65+, 25.18.68+, 26.0.66+, 26.2.47+, 26.4.36+, 26.6.28+, or 26.8.7+.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GoogleCloud

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

google cloud

looker

CVSS base

8.7

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

looker

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HIGHcvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.