CVE-2026-19750
CVE-2026-19750 — Tenda CH/CP/TX3 SSH hard-coded password
A flaw has been found in Tenda CH, CP and TX3 V21.x/V22.x/V25.x/V26.x/V27.x. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component SSH. Executing a manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded password. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Tenda (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
8.1
high · 6 sources
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade CH to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenda | CH | V21.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CH | V22.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CH | V25.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CH | V26.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CH | V27.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CP | V21.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CP | V22.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CP | V25.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CP | V26.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | CP | V27.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | TX3 | V21.* | Vulnerable |
| Tenda | TX3 | V22.* | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | CVSS 3.1 | high | 2.2 | 5.9 | NVD |
| 7.6 | CVSS 2.0 | high | 4.9 | 10 | vuldb.com (CNA) |
| 9.2 | CVSS 4.0 | critical | — | — | Tenda (CNA) |
| 8.1 | CVSS 3.1 | high | — | — | Tenda (CNA) |
| 8.1 | CVSS 3.0 | high | — | — | Tenda (CNA) |
| 7.6 | CVSS 2.0 | high | — | — | Tenda (CNA) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-259 · Use of Hard-coded Password
- Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Mitigation: For outbound authentication: store passwords outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-259
- CWE-255
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
3
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /V22.x/V25.x/V26.x/V27.x.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable CH, CP, TX3.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 3 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 8.1 (AV:N)
Aug 13, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Aug 13, 2026 · NVD
Reported · Advisory disclosed
Aug 13, 2026 · Tenda
Reported · VulDB entry created
Aug 13, 2026 · Tenda
Reported · VulDB entry last update
Aug 13, 2026 · Tenda
CVE published by mitre
Aug 13, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
6 on the record
- github.com/howitouchyou/Tenda-Smart-Camera-Vulnerability/blob/main/Tenda%20Camera%20SSH%20Hard-coded%20Password/Tenda%20Camera%20SSH%20Hard-coded%20Password.md
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-19750
Vendor Advisory
- vuldb.com/submit/868524
Vendor Advisory
- vuldb.com/vuln/389501
Vendor Advisory
- vuldb.com/vuln/389501/cti
Vendor Advisory
- www.tenda.com.cn/
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Tendaevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-259other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-19750 is Tenda CH/CP/TX3 SSH hard-coded password, a high vulnerability affecting CH, CP, TX3 from Tenda. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-19750. Public exploit evidence is: 3 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.1 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.