CVE-2026-27871
CVE-2026-27871 — TL280
Cwe-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Johnson Controls TL280 allows Cryptanalytic Attack. This issue affects TL280: before 5.63.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Johnson Controls (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
2.9
low
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade TL280 to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Controls | TL280 | 0 to < 5.63 | Vulnerable |
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.9 | CVSS 4.0 | low | — | — | Johnson Controls (CNA) |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-327
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
- T1036.001Masquerading: Invalid Code Signature
- T1553.002Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing
Social mentions
Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 2.9
Aug 14, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Aug 14, 2026 · NVD
Source activity
Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.
- 1×SVRS is calculatedAug 9, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
- 1×Tweets · 1 time tweeted.Aug 8, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
1 on the record
Coverage
1 story from the feeds we poll
Elsewhere on this site
- Johnson Controlsevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-327other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-27871 is TL280, a low vulnerability affecting TL280 from Johnson Controls. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-27871. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-27871. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 2.9 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.
