CVE-2026-3375
CVE-2026-3375 — LiteSpeed Cache <= 7.7 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via QUIC.cloud CCSS/UCSS REST API Endpoints
The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ccss and /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ucss REST API endpoints in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. These endpoints accept CSS content from QUIC.cloud callback notifications and store it to disk without sanitization. The stored content is later rendered inline frontend page loads without output escaping. The access control protecting these endpoints is IP-based validation that can potentially be bypassed when the WordPress site is deployed behind a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN with certain configurations. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, under certain conditions, to inject arbitrary JavaScript into CCSS/UCSS content.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, Wordfence
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
7.2
HIGH
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | CVSS 3.1 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-79
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ccss, /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ucss, /UCSS.
References
8 on the record
- www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/40fa29f5-525a-4986-91f9-0210a7594e46?source=cve
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/rest.cls.php#L108
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/cloud.cls.php#L2085
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/css.cls.php#L401
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/css.cls.php#L595
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/optimize.cls.php#L477
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/litespeed-cache/trunk/src/router.cls.php#L732
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3473912/
reference
Elsewhere on this site
- litespeedtechevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-79other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.