CVE-2026-34197
Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authenticated users could perform RCE via Jolokia MBeans
Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console. The default Jolokia access policy permits exec operations on all ActiveMQ MBeans (org.apache.activemq:*), including BrokerService.addNetworkConnector(String) and BrokerService.addConnector(String). An authenticated attacker can invoke these operations with a crafted discovery URI that triggers the VM transport's brokerConfig parameter to load a remote Spring XML application context using ResourceXmlApplicationContext. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.4 or 6.2.3, which fixes the issue
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Apache Software Foundation (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Confirmed
CISA KEV, listed Apr 16, 2026
EPSS
97%
ahead of 99.9% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
8.8
high
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
Active
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker to 5.19.5 or later (maven advisory GHSA-rxpj-7qvf-xv32).
CISA required action
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Federal deadline Apr 30, 2026 — passed 115 days ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ Broker | 0 to < 5.19.4 | Vulnerable |
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ Broker | 6.0.0 to < 6.2.3 | Vulnerable |
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ All | 0 to < 5.19.4 | Vulnerable |
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ All | 6.0.0 to < 6.2.3 | Vulnerable |
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ | 0 to < 5.19.4 | Vulnerable |
| Apache | Apache ActiveMQ | 6.0.0 to < 6.2.3 | Vulnerable |
| maven | org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker | < 5.19.5 | Vulnerable |
| maven | org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker | >= 6.0.0, < 6.2.3 | Vulnerable |
| maven | org.apache.activemq:activemq-all | < 5.19.5 | Vulnerable |
| maven | org.apache.activemq:activemq-all | >= 6.0.0, < 6.2.3 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
Low
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | high | 2.8 | 5.9 | CNA, GHSA |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-20Improper Input Validation
- CWE-94Code Injection
- CWE-78OS Command Injection
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
- T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
- T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
- T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable
CISA KEV details
CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
Listed
Apr 16, 2026
Federal deadline
Apr 30, 2026
passed 115 days ago
Ransomware use
Unknown
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
40
3 of the 5 sampled are weaponized
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /api/jolokia/.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ, org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker, org.apache.activemq:activemq-all.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 40 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 8.8 (AV:N)
Jul 15, 2026 · NVD
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Apr 16, 2026 · CISA
Initial · CVE published
Apr 7, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-rxpj-7qvf-xv32 published (high)
Apr 7, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
References
8 on the record
- activemq.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2026-34197-announcement.txt
Vendor Advisory
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/06/3
Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34197
Third Party Advisory
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2455869
Third Party Advisory
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-34197.json
Third Party Advisory
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-34197
US Government Resource
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34197
NVD, Vendor Advisory
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-rxpj-7qvf-xv32
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Apacheevery CVE for this vendor
- mavenevery CVE for this vendor
- April 2026what else CISA listed
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-20other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-34197 is Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authenticated users could perform RCE via Jolokia MBeans, a high vulnerability affecting Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ, org.apache.activemq:activemq-broker, org.apache.activemq:activemq-all from Apache Software Foundation, maven. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 40 public PoC repositories reported; 3 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 97% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.