CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
highRemote Code Execpublic exploit

CVE-2026-47683

CVE-2026-47683 — vm2: bufferAllocLimit cap bypassed by Buffer.concat and Buffer.from arrayLike

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.6, the bufferAllocLimit enforcement in lib/setup-sandbox.js does not cover Buffer.concat(list, totalLength) or Buffer.from(arrayLike) with an attacker-controlled length, allowing sandbox code to perform large synchronous host external-memory allocations that bypass the configured cap and can exhaust the host process. This issue is fixed in version 3.11.6.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, patriksimek (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

patriksimek

2 products listed

CVSS base

8.7

high

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade vm2 to 3.11.6 or later (npm advisory GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9).

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
patriksimekvm2< 3.11.6Vulnerable
npmvm2<= 3.11.5Vulnerable

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0highpatriksimek (CNA)

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

  • DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)

Mitigation: Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-770

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-528 · XML FloodCAPEC-230 · XML Nested PayloadsCAPEC-496 · ICMP FragmentationCAPEC-493 · SOAP Array BlowupCAPEC-487 · ICMP FloodCAPEC-147 · XML Ping of the DeathCAPEC-495 · UDP FragmentationCAPEC-486 · UDP FloodCAPEC-489 · SSL FloodCAPEC-469 · HTTP DoSCAPEC-231 · Oversized Serialized Data PayloadsCAPEC-494 · TCP Fragmentation
  • T1498.001Network Denial of Service: Direct Network Flood
  • T1499Endpoint Denial of Service
  • T1499.003Endpoint Denial of Service: Application Exhaustion Flood

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

2

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /sandbox, /setup-sandbox.js.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 2 public PoC repositories were reported.
EDR process telemetryhost service logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 8.7

    Aug 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Aug 17, 2026 · NVD

  4. Added · GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 published (high)

    Aug 17, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-47683 is vm2: bufferAllocLimit cap bypassed by Buffer.concat and Buffer.from arrayLike, a high vulnerability affecting vm2 from patriksimek, npm. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-47683. Public exploit evidence is: 2 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.7 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.