CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-88027

CVE-2026-88027 — Mass deletion and overwrite of embedded documents via query-operator injection in embedded record keys in MongoDB integration for Laravel

Improper neutralization of special elements in data query logic in the embedded-document relation handling of the MongoDB integration for Laravel can cause a caller-supplied embedded record identifier to be interpreted as a query condition rather than as a literal identifier. An authenticated user who can influence such an identifier may delete all embedded documents in a targeted record or overwrite an embedded document other than the intended target.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, mongodb

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

mongodb

laravel_mongodb_php

CVSS base

7.1

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

mongodb

Products (1)

laravel mongodb php

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HIGH——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-943

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • mongodbevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-943other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.