CVE-2014-0782
CVE-2014-0782 — Yokogawa CENTUM CS 3000 Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Stack-based buffer overflow in BKESimmgr.exe in the Expanded Test Functions package in Yokogawa CENTUM CS 1000, CENTUM CS 3000 Entry Class R3.09.50 and earlier, CENTUM VP R5.03.00 and earlier, CENTUM VP Entry Class R5.03.00 and earlier, Exaopc R3.71.02 and earlier, B/M9000CS R5.05.01 and earlier, and B/M9000 VP R7.03.01 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, icscert
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
57%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
8.3
HIGH
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.3 | CVSS 2.0 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-121
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Indexed by
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /M9000CS, /M9000.
References
6 on the record
- www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-14-070-01a
reference
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/66130
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2014/03/10/yokogawa-centum-cs3000-vulnerabilities
x_refsource_MISC
- www.yokogawa.com/dcs/security/ysar/dcs-ysar-index-en.htm.
reference
- www.yokogawa.com/dcs/security/ysar/YSAR-14-0001E.pdf
x_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred
- ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-133-01
x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.