CVE-2016-7035
CVE-2016-7035 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
An authorization flaw was found in Pacemaker before 1.1.16, where it did not properly guard its IPC interface. An attacker with an unprivileged account on a Pacemaker node could use this flaw to, for example, force the Local Resource Manager daemon to execute a script as root and thereby gain root access on the machine.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, redhat
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
8.8
HIGH
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.0 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-285
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1574.010Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions Weakness
- T1083File and Directory Discovery
- T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
References
8 on the record
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7035
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2614.html
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-08
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/5
mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2675.html
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html
mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
- github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/94214
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
Elsewhere on this site
- clusterlabsevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-285other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.