CVE-2016-9580
CVE-2016-9580 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
An integer overflow vulnerability was found in tiftoimage function in openjpeg 2.1.2, resulting in heap buffer overflow.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, redhat
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
2%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
3.3
LOW
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | CVSS 3.0 | LOW | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-190
- CWE-122
References
5 on the record
- github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/871
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-26
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/94822
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-9580
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/szukw000/openjpeg/commit/cadff5fb6e73398de26a92e96d3d7cac893af255
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Elsewhere on this site
- the openjpeg projectevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-190other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.