CVE-2017-13083
CVE-2017-13083 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
Akeo Consulting Rufus prior to version 2.17.1187 does not adequately validate the integrity of updates downloaded over HTTP, allowing an attacker to easily convince a user to execute arbitrary code
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, certcc
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
5.3
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | CVSS 3.0 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-295
- CWE-494
- CWE-345
- CWE-347
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1195.002Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain
- T1072Software Deployment Tools
- T1195.001Supply Chain Compromise: Software Dependencies and Development Tools
References
4 on the record
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/403768
third-party-advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN
- github.com/pbatard/rufus/issues/1009
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/100516
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- github.com/pbatard/rufus/commit/c3c39f7f8a11f612c4ebf7affce25ec6928eb1cb
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Elsewhere on this site
- akeo consultingevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-295other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.