CVE-2017-3738
CVE-2017-3738 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and…
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, openssl
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
13%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
Unscored
no source published a base score
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
References
25 on the record
- www.tenable.com/security/tns-2018-07
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.tenable.com/security/tns-2018-04
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:12.openssl.asc
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_FREEBSD
Elsewhere on this site
- openssl software foundationevery CVE for this vendor
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.