CVE-2017-7506
CVE-2017-7506 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
spice versions though 0.13 are vulnerable to out-of-bounds memory access when processing specially crafted messages from authenticated attacker to the spice server resulting into crash and/or server memory leak.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, redhat
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
4%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
Unscored
no source published a base score
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-119
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /or.
References
6 on the record
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3522
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/14/1
mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2471
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3907
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_DEBIAN
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/99583
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452606
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Elsewhere on this site
- the spice projectevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-119other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.