CVE-2018-1139
CVE-2018-1139 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence
A flaw was found in the way samba before 4.7.9 and 4.8.4 allowed the use of weak NTLMv1 authentication even when NTLMv1 was explicitly disabled. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to read the credential and other details passed between the samba server and client.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, redhat
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
3%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
5.4
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | CVSS 3.0 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-20
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
- T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
- T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable
References
9 on the record
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2613
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- usn.ubuntu.com/3738-1/
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2612
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1139
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/105084
vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3056
vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180814-0001/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-1139.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Elsewhere on this site
- the samba teamevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-20other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.