CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2019-25424

CVE-2019-25424 — Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via https_exceptions

Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting unsanitized input to the EXCEPTIONSITELIST parameter. Attackers can craft POST requests to the https_exceptions endpoint with script payloads to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers and steal session data.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulnCheck

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

comodo

comodo_dome_firewall

CVSS base

6.1

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

comodo

Products (1)

comodo dome firewall

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • comodoevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-79other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.