CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalSSRFpublic exploit

CVE-2020-7796

CVE-2020-7796 — Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability

Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) before 8.8.15 Patch 7 allows SSRF when WebEx zimlet is installed and zimlet JSP is enabled.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, Synacor (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Feb 17, 2026

EPSS

84%

ahead of 99.7% of scored CVEs

Affects

Synacor

Zimbra Collaboration Suite

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade Zimbra Collaboration Suite to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline Mar 10, 2026 — passed 208 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
SynacorZimbra Collaboration Suite—Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1critical3.95.9NVD, CNA
6.8CVSS 2.0medium8.66.4NVD

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

  • Read Application Data
  • Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands::

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.

CAPEC-664 · Server Side Request Forgery

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Feb 17, 2026

Federal deadline

Mar 10, 2026

passed 208 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

9

1 of the 5 sampled are weaponized

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

SOCRadar3 more posts on this CVEShowing 5 of 8 · Who is discussing this CVE, and how loudlyUnlock free

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Zimbra Collaboration Suite.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 9 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPScloud metadata access logsegress proxy logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)

    Jun 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Feb 17, 2026 · CISA

  4. 2020
  5. Initial · CVE published

    Feb 18, 2020 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

  • 19×TweetsMar 13, 2025 – Jul 4, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 9×SVRS was changedMar 16, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 1×CVE modified by NIST: CISA KEV details updated.Feb 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 1×CVE appeared in the Cve Trends.Feb 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

3 on the record

Coverage

6 stories from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2020-7796 is Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability, a critical vulnerability affecting Zimbra Collaboration Suite from Synacor. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 9 public PoC repositories reported; 1 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 84% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.