CVE-2022-0132
CVE-2022-0132 — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in chocobozzz/peertube
peertube is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, @huntrdev
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
4.8
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | CVSS 3.0 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-918
References
2 on the record
- huntr.dev/bounties/77ec5308-5561-4664-af21-d780df2d1e4b
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/chocobozzz/peertube/commit/7b54a81cccf6b4c12269e9d6897d608b1a99537a
x_refsource_MISC
Elsewhere on this site
- chocobozzzevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-918other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.