CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CRITICAL

CVE-2022-28812

CVE-2022-28812 — Use of Hard-coded Credentials in UWP3.0 allows SuperUser authentication bypass in Car Park Server.

In Carlo Gavazzi UWP3.0 in multiple versions and CPY Car Park Server in Version 2.8.3 a remote, unauthenticated attacker could make use of hard-coded credentials to gain SuperUser access to the device.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, CERTVDE

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

1%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

carlo gavazzi

4 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

CRITICAL

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

carlo gavazzi

Products (4)

uwp 3 0 monitoring gateway and controlleruwp 3 0 monitoring gateway and controller security enhanceduwp 3 0 monitoring gateway and controller edp versioncpy car park server

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CRITICAL——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-798

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1552.001Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in files
  • T1078.001Valid Accounts: Default Accounts

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.