CVE-2023-4463
CVE-2023-4463 — Poly CCX 400/CCX 600/Trio 8800/Trio C60 HTTP Header denial of service
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Poly CCX 400, CCX 600, Trio 8800 and Trio C60. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component HTTP Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument Cookie leads to denial of service. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-249256.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulDB
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
5.3
MEDIUM
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (4)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | CVSS 3.1 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-404
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1498.001Network Denial of Service: Direct Network Flood
- T1499Endpoint Denial of Service
- T1499.003Endpoint Denial of Service: Application Exhaustion Flood
References
5 on the record
- vuldb.com/?id.249256
vdb-entry, technical-description
- vuldb.com/?ctiid.249256
signature, permissions-required
- modzero.com/en/advisories/mz-23-01-poly-voip/
related
- github.com/modzero/MZ-23-01-Poly-VoIP-Devices
exploit
- fahrplan.events.ccc.de/congress/2023/fahrplan/events/11919.html
related
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.