CVE-2023-7028
CVE-2023-7028 — Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password in GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.1 prior to 16.1.6, 16.2 prior to 16.2.9, 16.3 prior to 16.3.7, 16.4 prior to 16.4.5, 16.5 prior to 16.5.6, 16.6 prior to 16.6.4, and 16.7 prior to 16.7.2 in which user account password reset emails could be delivered to an unverified email address.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, GitLab (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, Exploit-DB
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Confirmed
CISA KEV, listed May 1, 2024
EPSS
95%
ahead of 99.9% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
9.8
critical · 2 sources
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
Active
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade to versions 16.7.2, 16.6.4, 16.5.6, 16.4.5, 16.3.7, 16.2.9, 16.1.6 or above.
CISA required action
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Federal deadline May 22, 2024 — passed 852 days ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.1 to < 16.1.6 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.2 to < 16.2.9 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.3 to < 16.3.7 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.4 to < 16.4.5 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.5 to < 16.5.6 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.6 to < 16.6.4 | Vulnerable |
| GitLab | GitLab | 16.7 to < 16.7.2 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | CVSS 3.1 | critical | 3.9 | 5.8 | gitlab.com (CNA), GitLab (CNA) |
| 9.8 | CVSS 3.1 | critical | 3.9 | 5.9 | NVD |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-640
CISA KEV details
CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
Listed
May 1, 2024
Federal deadline
May 22, 2024
passed 852 days ago
Ransomware use
Unknown
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Exploit entries
1
Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /EE.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable GitLab.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)
Jun 17, 2026 · NVD
- 2024
Added to CISA KEV catalog
May 1, 2024 · CISA
Added · remote entry: GitLab CE/EE < 16.7.2 - Password Reset
Mar 14, 2024 · Exploit-DB
Initial · CVE published
Jan 12, 2024 · NVD
References
7 on the record
- gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/436084
Exploit, Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
- hackerone.com/reports/2293343
Permissions Required
- www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/critical-gitlab-account-takeover-vulnerability-cve-2023-7028
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-7028
US Government Resource
- www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51889
Vendor Advisory
- about.gitlab.com/releases/2024/01/11/critical-security-release-gitlab-16-7-2-released/
Vendor Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-7028
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- GitLabevery CVE for this vendor
- May 2024what else CISA listed
- Unclassifiedsame class
- CWE-640other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2023-7028 is Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password in GitLab, a critical vulnerability affecting GitLab from GitLab. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 95% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.