CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CRITICAL

CVE-2024-58385

CVE-2024-58385 — Yonyou U8 CRM SQL Injection via fillbacksettingedit.php

Yonyou U8 CRM contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the fillbacksettingedit.php configuration endpoint where the DontCheckLogin=1 parameter bypasses authentication and the id parameter is incorporated into SQL queries without sanitization. Attackers can exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary SQL commands and, on Microsoft SQL Server deployments with xp_cmdshell enabled, write backdoor files and execute arbitrary operating system commands. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-02-13.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulnCheck

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

yonyou

u8_crm

CVSS base

9.8

CRITICAL

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

u8 crm

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CRITICAL——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-89

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • yonyouevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-89other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.