CVE-2024-9802 — Conformance validation endpoint discloses detail about service to unauthenticated users

The conformance validation endpoint is public so everybody can verify the conformance of onboarded services. The response could contain specific information about the service, including available endpoints, and swagger. It could advise about the running version of a service to an attacker. The attacker could also check if a service is running.

Published Oct 10, 2024Updated Oct 10, 2024Sources: cvelistV5, Zowe

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

open mainframe project

2 products listed

CVSS base

5.3

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (2)

open mainframe project linuxfoundation

Products (2)

zowezowe api mediation layer

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
5.3	CVSS 3.1	MEDIUM	—	—	cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-312

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

T1005Data from Local System
T1552.004Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys

References

1 on the record

github.com/zowe/api-layer
product

Elsewhere on this site

open mainframe projectevery CVE for this vendor
linuxfoundationevery CVE for this vendor
CWE-312other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.