CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUMpublic exploit

CVE-2025-11449

CVE-2025-11449 — Reflected Cross Site Scripting in ServiceNow AI Platform

ServiceNow has addressed a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform. This vulnerability could result in arbitrary code being executed within the browsers of ServiceNow users who click on a specially crafted link. ServiceNow has addressed this vulnerability by deploying a relevant security update to the majority of hosted instances. Relevant security updates also have been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers, partners, and hosted customers with unique configuration. Further, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed patches and hot fixes. We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade if they have not already done so.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, SN

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

servicenow

servicenow_ai_platform

CVSS base

5.3

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

servicenow ai platform

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Indexed by

poc in github

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.