CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CRITICAL

CVE-2025-11546

CVE-2025-11546 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence

CLUSTERPRO X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 and EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 allows an attacker sends specially crafted network packets to the product, arbitrary OS commands may be executed without authentication.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, NEC

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

nec

2 products listed

CVSS base

9.3

CRITICAL

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

nec

Products (2)

clusterpro x for linux expresscluster x for linuxclusterpro x singleserversafe for linux expresscluster x singleserversafe for linux

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CRITICAL——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-78

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • necevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-78other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.