CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
highRemote Code Execpublic exploit

CVE-2025-12737

CVE-2025-12737 — Arbitrary Code Execution via Administrative Operations in Multiple WSO2 Products Allows Remote Code Execution

The administrative operations within the Carbon Console do not adequately validate specific user-supplied input. This oversight allows a malicious actor with administrative privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code remotely. Successful exploitation enables a threat actor with administrative privileges and Carbon Console access to execute remote arbitrary code through specific administrative operations, leading to a complete compromise of the affected system.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, WSO2 (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

WSO2

31 products listed

CVSS base

8.4

high

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Follow the instructions given on https://security.docs.wso2.com/en/latest/security-announcements/security-advisories/2026/WSO2-2025-4771/#solution

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
WSO2WSO2 Open Banking AM0 to < 2.0.0Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Open Banking AM2.0.0 to < 2.0.0.398Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Open Banking IAM0 to < 2.0.0Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Open Banking IAM2.0.0 to < 2.0.0.418Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Traffic Manager4.5.0 to < 4.5.0.34Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Traffic Manager4.6.0 to < 4.6.0.1Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Universal Gateway4.5.0 to < 4.5.0.34Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 Universal Gateway4.6.0 to < 4.6.0.1Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 API Control Plane4.5.0 to < 4.5.0.36Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 API Control Plane4.6.0 to < 4.6.0.1Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 API Manager0 to < 3.1.0Vulnerable
WSO2WSO2 API Manager3.1.0 to < 3.1.0.349Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Changed

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Adjacent

Privileges Req

High

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.4CVSS 3.1high1.76CNA, WSO2 (CNA), GHSA

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

  • Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
  • DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
  • Read Files or Directories
  • Modify Files or Directories

Mitigation: If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-78OS Command Injection

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-15 · Command DelimitersCAPEC-88 · OS Command InjectionCAPEC-43 · Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-6 · Argument Injection

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

2

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 2 public PoC repositories were reported.
EDR process telemetryhost service logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 8.4 (AV:A)

    Sep 3, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Sep 3, 2026 · NVD

  4. Added · GHSA-h2f7-75mh-c4rv published (high)

    Sep 3, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

  5. CVE published by MITRE.

    Sep 3, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-12737 is Arbitrary Code Execution via Administrative Operations in Multiple WSO2 Products Allows Remote Code Execution, a high vulnerability affecting WSO2 Open Banking AM, WSO2 Open Banking IAM, WSO2 Traffic Manager, WSO2 Universal Gateway, WSO2 API Control Plane, WSO2 API Manager, WSO2 Identity Server as Key Manager, WSO2 Identity Server from WSO2. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2025-12737. Public exploit evidence is: 2 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.4 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.