What is CVE-2025-25257?

CVE-2025-25257 is Fortinet FortiWeb SQL Injection Vulnerability. The supplied enrichment data classifies it as Injection mapped to CWE-89 SQL Injection.

Which versions are affected?

Affected product and version evidence is listed in the product table above. Current public advisories should be checked for exact version scope before patch targeting is finalized.

Is there active exploitation?

Yes: CISA KEV signal present. If exploitation is not confirmed from current sources, teams should document that status and continue monitoring KEV, vendor, and telemetry updates.

Is there a public exploit?

37 public PoC repositories reported; 2 marked weaponized in current dataset. Public exploit or PoC availability should raise triage priority, especially for exposed or business-critical systems.

How can defenders detect it?

Start with web/proxy/WAF logs, application logs, network IDS/IPS, database audit logs where available. Look for vulnerability-class behavior, product errors, suspicious authentication events, exploit probes, and abnormal process activity based only on evidence that applies to the affected product.

How should teams prioritize it?

Prioritize CVE-2025-25257 using CVSS 9.8, EPSS 100%, KEV status, public PoC status, and asset exposure. Internet-facing, privileged, or business-critical deployments should be handled first.

Are workarounds available?

Workarounds are not confirmed from current sources. Fixed-version evidence is listed in the mitigation section above.

Which threat actors are linked publicly?

Publicly linked actor or ransomware signals in the supplied enrichment data: Pat Bear (), Shadow Network (), The White Company (), Infy (), Operation Talked (). Do not attribute exploitation to a threat actor unless the source evidence explicitly supports that linkage.

What should be done in the next 24 hours?

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations. Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class. Open remediation tickets with affected assets, owners, evidence status, and detection coverage so decisions are traceable.

CISA KEVcriticalInjectionpublic exploit

CVE-2025-25257

CVE-2025-25257 — Fortinet FortiWeb SQL Injection Vulnerability

Q: Is it in CISA KEV?

Yes. The supplied enrichment data lists CVE-2025-25257 in CISA KEV with required action: Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.. KEV status should be monitored because it can change after initial disclosure or after exploitation becomes publicly confirmed.

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.10 allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.

Published Jul 17, 2025Updated Jun 17, 2026Sources: NVD, Fortinet (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, Exploit-DB, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Jul 18, 2025

EPSS

100%

top of FIRST's scoreset

Affects

Fortinet

4 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.6.4 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.4.8 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.2.11 or above Upgrade to FortiWeb version 7.0.11 or above

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline Aug 8, 2025 — passed 402 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status
Fortinet	FortiWeb	7.6.0 to <= 7.6.3	Vulnerable
Fortinet	FortiWeb	7.4.0 to <= 7.4.7	Vulnerable
Fortinet	FortiWeb	7.2.0 to <= 7.2.10	Vulnerable
Fortinet	FortiWeb	7.0.0 to <= 7.0.10	Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
9.8	CVSS 3.1	critical	3.9	5.9	Fortinet (CNA), NVD
9.6	CVSS 3.1	critical	—	—	Fortinet (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Read Application Data
Bypass Protection Mechanism
Modify Application Data

Mitigation: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-89SQL Injection

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-470 · Expanding Control over the Operating System from the DatabaseCAPEC-109 · Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-110 · SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-7 · Blind SQL InjectionCAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-66 · SQL Injection

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

CISAThat month →

Listed

Jul 18, 2025

Federal deadline

Aug 8, 2025

passed 402 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

2 of the 5 sampled are weaponized

Exploit entries

Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

17 more posts on this CVEShowing 5 of 22 · Who is discussing this CVE, and how loudlyUnlock free

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable FortiWeb.
Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 37 public PoC repositories were reported.

web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPSdatabase audit logs

Groups associated with this CVE

Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.

Pat BearShadow NetworkThe White CompanyInfyOperation Talked

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)
Jun 17, 2026 · NVD
Cve is exploited GarethMSheldon/Fortinet-FortiWeb-Fabric-Connector-CVE-2025-25257-Detection
Mar 2, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Cve is exploited FortiWeb Fabric Connector 7.6.x - SQL Injection to Remote Code Execution
Feb 5, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Added · webapps entry: FortiWeb Fabric Connector 7.6.x - SQL Injection to Remote Code Execution
Feb 4, 2026 · Exploit-DB
2025
Cve is exploited mr-r3b00t/CVE-2025-25257
Nov 11, 2025 · SOCRadar CTI
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Jul 18, 2025 · CISA
Initial · CVE published
Jul 17, 2025 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

11×SVRS was changedNov 15, 2025 – Aug 14, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
9×Tweets · 1 time tweeted.Nov 5, 2025 – Aug 15, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
3×Github ReposNov 11, 2025 – Mar 1, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
2×CVE modified by MITRE: CVSS metrics updated.Jan 15, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
1×1 time mentioned on 1 Telegram channelFeb 5, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

6 on the record

fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-151
Vendor Advisory, NIST, Mitre
packetstorm.news/files/id/210193/
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, NIST
www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52473
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, NIST, GITHUB
github.com/0xbigshaq/CVE-2025-25257
Third Party Advisory, GITHUB, NIST
www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-25257
US Government Resource
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25257
Vendor Advisory

Coverage

10 stories from the feeds we poll

5 more reports on this CVEShowing 5 of 10 · Vendor research and security press coverageUnlock free

Elsewhere on this site

Fortinetevery CVE for this vendor
July 2025what else CISA listed
Injectionsame class
CWE-89other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-25257 is Fortinet FortiWeb SQL Injection Vulnerability, a critical vulnerability affecting FortiWeb from Fortinet. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 37 public PoC repositories reported; 2 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 100% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.