CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2025-3442

CVE-2025-3442 — Information Disclosure Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo IoT Smart Hub

This vulnerability exists in TP-Link Tapo H200 V1 IoT Smart Hub due to storage of Wi-Fi credentials in plain text within the device firmware. An attacker with physical access could exploit this by extracting the firmware and analyzing the binary data to obtain the Wi-Fi credentials stored on the vulnerable device.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, CERT-In

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

tp link

tapo_h200_v1_iot_smart_hub

CVSS base

4.4

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

tp link

Products (1)

tapo h200 v1 iot smart hub

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
4.4CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-312

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1005Data from Local System
  • T1552.004Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • tp linkevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-312other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.