CVE-2025-36754 — Authentication bypass on web interface

The authentication mechanism on web interface is not properly implemented. It is possible to bypass authentication checks by crafting a post request with new settings since there is no session token or authentication in place. This would allow an attacker for instance to point the device to an arbitrary address for domain name resolution to e.g. facililitate a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack.

Published Dec 13, 2025Updated Dec 16, 2025Sources: cvelistV5, DIVD

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

growatt

shinelan_x

CVSS base

9.3

CRITICAL

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

growatt

Products (1)

shinelan x

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
9.3	CVSS 4.0	CRITICAL	—	—	cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-290

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

T1134Access Token Manipulation
T1528Steal Application Access Token
T1539Steal Web Session Cookie

References

1 on the record

csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2025-36754/
third-party-advisory

Elsewhere on this site

growattevery CVE for this vendor
CWE-290other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.