CVE-2025-53837
CVE-2025-53837 — org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml has an Eval Injection issue
XWiki Rendering is a generic rendering system that converts textual input in a given syntax (wiki syntax, HTML, etc) into another syntax (XHTML, etc). Prior to versions 14.10.2 and 15.0 RC1, any user who can edit their own user profile or any other document can execute arbitrary script macros including Groovy and Python macros that allow remote code execution including unrestricted read and write access to all wiki contents. The reason is that rendering output is included as content of HTML macros without further escaping and it is thus possible to close the HTML macro and inject script macros that are executed with programming rights. This has been patched in XWiki 14.10.2 and 15.0 RC1 by making sure that rendering output cannot close the surrounding HTML macro. A possible workaround is available. It is, in principle, possible to add escaping to all places where rendering output is used in wiki documents, but at the moment there is no list of them.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, xwiki (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
9.9
critical
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml to 14.10.2 or later (maven advisory GHSA-26vp-8gxg-v4pg).
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| xwiki | xwiki-rendering | < 14.10.2 | Vulnerable |
| maven | org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml | < 14.10.2 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Changed
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
Low
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | CVSS 3.1 | critical | 3.1 | 6 | GitHub (CNA), xwiki (CNA), GHSA |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-95 · Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
- Read Files or Directories
- Read Application Data
- Bypass Protection Mechanism
- Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Mitigation: If possible, refactor your code so that it does not need to use eval() at all.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-95Eval Injection
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1027.006Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML Smuggling
- T1027.009Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded Payloads
- T1564.009Hide Artifacts: Resource Forking
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable xwiki-rendering, org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.9 (AV:N)
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-26vp-8gxg-v4pg published (critical)
Sep 18, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by MITRE.
Sep 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
8 on the record
- github.com/xwiki/xwiki-rendering/commit/92bc8095ed3acce15ab200c8525e1623b4898be5
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/xwiki/xwiki-rendering/releases/tag/xwiki-rendering-14.10.2
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/xwiki/xwiki-rendering/releases/tag/xwiki-rendering-15.0-rc-1
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/xwiki/xwiki-rendering/security/advisories/GHSA-26vp-8gxg-v4pg
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- jira.xwiki.org/browse/XRENDERING-693
Vendor Advisory, Mitre
- jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-20313
Vendor Advisory, Mitre
- jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-20327
Vendor Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-26vp-8gxg-v4pg
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- xwikievery CVE for this vendor
- mavenevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-95other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-53837 is org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml has an Eval Injection issue, a critical vulnerability affecting xwiki-rendering, org.xwiki.rendering:xwiki-rendering-xml from xwiki, maven. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2025-53837. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2025-53837. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.9 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.