CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2025-58405

CVE-2025-58405 — Lack of protection mechanisms against Clickjacking attacks

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into performing unintended actions, including potentially bypassing CSRF/XSRF defenses.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, CERT-PL

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

cgm

cgm_clininet

CVSS base

5.3

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

cgm

Products (1)

cgm clininet

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-1021

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1036.004Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service
  • T1056Input Capture
  • T1548.004Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Elevated Execution with Prompt

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /XSRF.

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • cgmevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-1021other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.