CVE-2025-6218
CVE-2025-6218 — RARLAB WinRAR Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
RARLAB WinRAR Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of RARLAB WinRAR. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of file paths within archive files. A crafted file path can cause the process to traverse to unintended directories. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-27198.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, RARLAB (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Confirmed
CISA KEV, listed Dec 9, 2025
EPSS
90%
ahead of 99.8% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
7.8
high
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
Active
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade WinRAR to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
CISA required action
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Federal deadline Dec 30, 2025 — passed 258 days ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| RARLAB | WinRAR | 7.11 (64-bit) | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Local
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
Required
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | CVSS 3.0 | high | 1.8 | 5.9 | Trend Micro (ZDI) (CNA), RARLAB (CNA) |
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
- Modify Files or Directories
- Read Files or Directories
- DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Mitigation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an accept known good input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, boat may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as red or blue. Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single . character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as / to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering / is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if ../ sequences are removed from the .../...// string in a sequential fashion, two instances of ../ would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the ../ string.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-22Path Traversal
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
CISA KEV details
CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
Listed
Dec 9, 2025
Federal deadline
Dec 30, 2025
passed 258 days ago
Ransomware use
Unknown
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
8
3 of the 5 sampled are weaponized
Exploit entries
6
Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes
Social mentions
Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has added a WinRAR vulnerability tracked as CVE-2025-6218 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, elevating a desktop application flaw into a federal patching priority. The designation reflects evidence that
@rtehrani· Aug 8, 2026
RT @virusbtn: Robin Dost analyses a UAC-0226 sample, identifying it as a GIFTEDCROOK stealer variant. The chain starts with CVE-2025-6218 &…
@skocherhan· Jul 22, 2026
RT @smica83: 'penis.11' is a ZIP, seen from Poland @abuse_ch CVE-2025-6218 and 8088 exploit. Some kind of Ransomware in it. 4472b8c557a3…
@skocherhan· Jun 23, 2026
🚨 #ThreatIntel: New cyber espionage campaign targeting Pakistan's defense sector (Ministry of Defence / Air Force) 🇵🇰 An @anyrun_app sample reveals a malicious ZIP archive leveraging a WinRAR Path Traversal vulnerability (CVE-2025-6218) with NTFS Alternate Data Streams (ADS). https://t.co/pO5pKz3CTR
@askardyuss· Jun 18, 2026
Robin Dost analyses a UAC-0226 sample, identifying it as a GIFTEDCROOK stealer variant. The chain starts with CVE-2025-6218 & CVE-2025-8088; a LNK launches a payload that decodes a binary, uses chunked data exfiltration & reconstructs its C2 at runtime. https://t.co/aYxPmhweL9 https://t.co/8JaV1sDdie
@virusbtn· Apr 10, 2026
35 more posts on this CVEShowing 5 of 40 · Who is discussing this CVE, and how loudlyUnlock freeDetection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 14 public PoC repositories were reported.
Groups associated with this CVE
Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.
21 more threat groups on this CVEShowing 5 of 26 · Attribution, campaigns and the malware each one runsUnlock free- ip64.7.198.1242
Threatview.io Feeds · Nov 10, 2025
- ip136.0.141.13879
AbuseIPDB Hourly Update · Jan 5, 2026
- ip157.20.182.7548
Maltrail Malware Feeds · Nov 15, 2025
- hash2a8ea9f1ad8936fb302243faa64b91c5767df411923715cbdb1a869e3bfd7e6d93
MalwareBazaar Feeds · Apr 9, 2026
- hash4528d5cf07bf0e1ac769b390236cab1bf34b938c93
MalwareBazaar Feeds · Apr 9, 2026
5 more indicators on this CVEShowing 5 of 10 · Hashes, addresses and domains from a live threat exchangeUnlock freeTimeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 7.8 (AV:L)
Jun 17, 2026 · NVD
- 2025
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Dec 9, 2025 · CISA
Initial · CVE published
Jun 21, 2025 · NVD
Source activity
Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.
- 17×SVRS was changedJan 27, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
- 11×TweetsFeb 3, 2026 – Aug 9, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
- 2×TelegramMar 10, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
8 on the record
- www.win-rar.com/singlenewsview.html?&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=276&cHash=388885bd3908a40726f535c026f94eb6
Release Notes
- www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-409/
Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, NIST, Mitre
- foresiet.com/blog/apt-c-08-winrar-directory-traversal-exploit/
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, NIST
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-6218
US Government Resource
- www.secpod.com/blog/archive-terror-dissecting-the-winrar-cve-2025-6218-exploit-apt-c-08s-stealth-move/
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, GITHUB, NIST
- www.win-rar.com/singlenewsview.html?&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=276&cHash=388885bd3908a40726f535c026f94eb6
NIST, Mitre
- www.win-rar.com/singlenewsview.html?&L=0&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=276&cHash=b5165454d983fc9717bc8748901a64f9
Vendor Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6218
Vendor Advisory
Coverage
15 stories from the feeds we poll
Exploits and vulnerabilities in Q2 2026
securelist.com · Aug 26, 2026
SANS Stormcast Tuesday, June 24th, 2025: Ichano ATHome IP Camera Scans; Netscaler Vulnerability; WinRar Vulnerability
isc.sans.edu · Jun 24, 2025
June 2026 CVE Landscape
recordedfuture.com · Jul 10, 2026
GIFTEDCROOK Payload Targets Chrome, Firefox, KeePass, OpenVPN, and Sensitive Documents - cyberpress.org
cyberpress.org · Jun 29, 2026
GhostShell Malware Uses mTLS Implant and Telegram Dead-Drop to Target Ukrainian Drone Operations
cybersecuritynews.com · Jun 24, 2026
10 more reports on this CVEShowing 5 of 15 · Vendor research and security press coverageUnlock freeElsewhere on this site
- RARLABevery CVE for this vendor
- December 2025what else CISA listed
- Path Traversalsame class
- CWE-22other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- Only the 5 indicator(s) reported for this CVE are available; no packet-level or host-forensic artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-6218 is RARLAB WinRAR Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, a high vulnerability affecting WinRAR from RARLAB. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 14 public PoC repositories reported; 3 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 7.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 90% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.