CVE-2025-8927
CVE-2025-8927 — mtons mblog Verification Code send_code excessive authentication
A vulnerability was determined in mtons mblog up to 3.5.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /email/send_code of the component Verification Code Handler. The manipulation of the argument email leads to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. The attack may be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulDB
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
3.7
LOW
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
PoC
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | CVSS 3.1 | LOW | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-307
- CWE-799
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1110.001Brute Force: Password Guessing
- T1078Valid Accounts
- T1110.003Brute Force: Password Spraying
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /email/send_code.
References
4 on the record
- vuldb.com/?id.319886
vdb-entry, technical-description
- vuldb.com/?ctiid.319886
signature, permissions-required
- vuldb.com/?submit.631654
third-party-advisory
- gitee.com/mtons/mblog/issues/ICPMJR
exploit, issue-tracking
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.