CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2025-9269

CVE-2025-9269 — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability found in embedded web server

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the embedded web server in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to force the device to send an arbitrary HTTP request to a third-party server. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to internal network access / potential data disclosure from a device.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, Lexmark

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

lexmark

cx_xc_cs_ms_mx_xm_et_al

CVSS base

6.9

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

cx xc cs ms mx xm et al

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MEDIUMcvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-918

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • lexmarkevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-918other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.