CVE-2026-0297
CVE-2026-0297 — GlobalProtect App: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability during UDP Tunnel Handshake
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app that enables a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacker or a rogue gateway to disrupt system processes and potentially execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges (SYSTEM privileges on Windows, and root privileges on macOS and Linux).
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Palo Alto Networks (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Reported
not confirmed by CISA
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
5.2
medium
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
VERSION MINOR VERSION SUGGESTED SOLUTION GlobalProtect App 6.3/6.2 on Linux 6.2.0 through 6.3.3-h14 Upgrade to 6.3.3-h15 or later. GlobalProtect App 6.0 on Linux 6.0.0 through 6.0.14 Upgrade to 6.0.15 or later. GlobalProtect App 6.3 on macOS 6.3.0 through 6.3.3-h13 Upgrade to 6.3.3-h14 (6.3.3-1121) or later. GlobalProtect App 6.2 on macOS 6.2.0 through 6.2.8-h12 Upgrade to 6.2.8-h13 (6.2.8-1045) or later. GlobalProtect App 6.0 on macOS 6.0.0 through 6.0.14 Upgrade to 6.0.15 or later. GlobalProtect App 6.3 on Windows 6.3.0 through 6.3.3-h13 Upgrade to 6.3.3-h14 (6.3.3-1121) or later. GlobalPro…
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.3.0 to < 6.3.3-h15 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.2.0 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.0.0 to < 6.0.15 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.3.0 to < 6.3.3-h14 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.2.0 to < 6.2.8-h13 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.0.0 to < 6.0.15 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.3.0 to < 6.3.5 | Vulnerable |
| Palo Alto | GlobalProtect App | 6.0.0 to < 6.0.15 | Vulnerable |
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | CVSS 4.0 | medium | — | — | Palo Alto Networks (CNA) |
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write
- Modify Memory
- DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
- Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands::
Mitigation: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-787
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
11
2 of the 5 sampled are weaponized
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 11 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 5.2
Aug 13, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Aug 13, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-pc3v-5r9c-7gm7 published (medium)
Aug 13, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
Reported · Initial Publication.
Aug 12, 2026 · Palo Alto Networks
References
3 on the record
- security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-0297
Vendor Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0297
NVD
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-pc3v-5r9c-7gm7
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Coverage
2 stories from the feeds we poll
Elsewhere on this site
- Palo Altoevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-787other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-0297 is GlobalProtect App: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability during UDP Tunnel Handshake, a medium vulnerability affecting GlobalProtect App from Palo Alto Networks. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Exploitation is reported, but no independent confirmation is available in the sources we have. Public exploit evidence is: 11 public PoC repositories reported; 2 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 5.2 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.