CVE-2026-102330
CVE-2026-102330 — Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer…
Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Google (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, Red Hat (VEX)
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
Not scored
FIRST has not published a score
CVSS base
Unscored
no source published a base score
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade Chrome to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
Red Hat VEX · CVE-2026-102330
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrome | 154.0.8037.92 to < 154.0.8037.92 | Vulnerable |
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | CVSS 3.1 | low | — | — | Red Hat (VEX) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-863Incorrect Authorization
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Initial · CVE published
Sep 29, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-vv45-qw3h-rvwh published (unknown)
Sep 29, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
References
6 on the record
- chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01807488085.html
Vendor Advisory
- issues.chromium.org/issues/498793976
Vendor Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102330
NVD
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-vv45-qw3h-rvwh
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102330
Vendor Advisory
- www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-102330
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Googleevery CVE for this vendor
- Access Controlsame class
- CWE-863other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-102330 is Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer…, a unscored vulnerability affecting Chrome from Google. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-102330. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-102330. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS null describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.