CVE-2026-102930
CVE-2026-102930 — virtualenv: Downloaded seed wheels (pip/setuptools) are not integrity-checked before use
virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments. Prior to 21.7.12, download_wheel() accepts pip and setuptools seed wheels fetched for periodic updates or the --download option without checking their bytes against an authoritative digest equivalent to the embedded wheels' BUNDLE_SHA256 verification. A compromised index, stale mirror, or intercepted TLS connection can substitute a different wheel under the requested distribution, version, and filename, after which virtualenv caches and seeds the attacker-controlled wheel into subsequently created environments. The verification applies to the default PyPI path and is intentionally skipped when PIP_INDEX_URL, PIP_EXTRA_INDEX_URL, or PIP_INDEX configures a custom index that may legitimately publish rebuilt wheels. This issue is fixed in version 21.7.12.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, pypa (CNA), GitHub, Red Hat (VEX)
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
Not scored
FIRST has not published a score
CVSS base
7.7
high · 2 sources
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade virtualenv to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
Red Hat VEX · CVE-2026-102930
none_available: Affected
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypa | virtualenv | < 21.7.12 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
P
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.7 | CVSS 4.0 | high | — | — | pypa (CNA) |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | high | — | — | Red Hat (VEX) |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-494
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
- T1195.002Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain
- T1072Software Deployment Tools
- T1195.001Supply Chain Compromise: Software Dependencies and Development Tools
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable virtualenv.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 7.7 (AV:N)
Sep 29, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 29, 2026 · NVD
References
7 on the record
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/commit/a01ed3e2f239d6ab1fce62c5c7664ccf268fff6d
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/pull/3251
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102930
Vendor Advisory
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543652
Vendor Advisory
- www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-102930
Vendor Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102930
NVD
Elsewhere on this site
- pypaevery CVE for this vendor
- Unclassifiedsame class
- CWE-494other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-102930 is virtualenv: Downloaded seed wheels (pip/setuptools) are not integrity-checked before use, a high vulnerability affecting virtualenv from pypa. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-102930. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-102930. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 7.7 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.