What is CVE-2026-104055?

CVE-2026-104055 is Monitoring-user password logged in cleartext by postgres_exporter in postgresql VM charm. The supplied enrichment data classifies it as Info Disclosure mapped to CWE-532 CWE-532.

Which versions are affected?

Affected product and version evidence is listed in the product table above. Current public advisories should be checked for exact version scope before patch targeting is finalized.

Is there active exploitation?

Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-104055. If exploitation is not confirmed from current sources, teams should document that status and continue monitoring KEV, vendor, and telemetry updates.

No. CVE-2026-104055 is not listed in CISA KEV in the supplied enrichment data. KEV status should be monitored because it can change after initial disclosure or after exploitation becomes publicly confirmed.

Is there a public exploit?

1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. Public exploit or PoC availability should raise triage priority, especially for exposed or business-critical systems.

How can defenders detect it?

Start with web/proxy/WAF logs, application logs, network IDS/IPS where available. Look for vulnerability-class behavior, product errors, suspicious authentication events, exploit probes, and abnormal process activity based only on evidence that applies to the affected product.

How should teams prioritize it?

Prioritize CVE-2026-104055 using CVSS 5.3, EPSS 0%, KEV status, public PoC status, and asset exposure. Internet-facing, privileged, or business-critical deployments should be handled first.

Are workarounds available?

The supplied mitigation guidance says to apply vendor patches and restrict external exposure until fixed. Fixed-version evidence is listed in the mitigation section above.

Which threat actors are linked publicly?

No public threat actor linkage is confirmed from current sources. Do not attribute exploitation to a threat actor unless the source evidence explicitly supports that linkage.

What should be done in the next 24 hours?

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations. Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class. Open remediation tickets with affected assets, owners, evidence status, and detection coverage so decisions are traceable.

mediumInfo Disclosurepublic exploit

CVE-2026-104055

CVE-2026-104055 — Monitoring-user password logged in cleartext by postgres_exporter in postgresql VM charm

The postgresql-operator charm runs a Prometheus postgres_exporter to collect database metrics using a dedicated "monitoring" PostgreSQL user. On database connection errors, the exporter writes the monitoring user's password in cleartext to its logs. Any actor able to read those logs can recover the password, which grants read-only pg_monitor access to PostgreSQL. This is fixed in the dev track (14/edge) in revisions 1189 (arm64) and 1190 (amd64), and in the stable track (14/stable) in revisions 1216 (arm64) and 1217 (amd64).

Published Oct 2, 2026Updated Oct 2, 2026Sources: NVD, Canonical (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

Canonical

4 products listed

CVSS base

5.3

medium

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade postgresql-operator to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status
Canonical	postgresql-operator	0 to < 1189	Vulnerable
Canonical	postgresql-operator	0 to < 1190	Vulnerable
Canonical	postgresql-operator	0 to < 1216	Vulnerable
Canonical	postgresql-operator	0 to < 1217	Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Scope

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

Low

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
5.3	CVSS 4.0	medium	—	—	Canonical (CNA)

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File

Read Application Data

Mitigation: Consider seriously the sensitivity of the information written into log files. Do not write secrets into the log files.

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-532

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-215 · Fuzzing and observing application log data/errors for application mapping

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /edge), /stable).
Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable postgresql-operator.
Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.

web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 5.3 (AV:N)
Oct 2, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Oct 2, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-3533-w4pf-7x2r published (medium)
Oct 2, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by MITRE.
Oct 2, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

6 on the record

github.com/canonical/charmed-postgresql-snap/pull/305
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, NIST
github.com/canonical/charmed-postgresql-snap/pull/307
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, NIST
github.com/canonical/postgresql-operator/pull/1863
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, NIST
github.com/canonical/postgresql-operator/security/advisories/GHSA-rcx7-7rh5-r542
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-104055
NVD
github.com/advisories/GHSA-3533-w4pf-7x2r
Exploit, Third Party Advisory

Elsewhere on this site

Canonicalevery CVE for this vendor
Info Disclosuresame class
CWE-532other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-104055 is Monitoring-user password logged in cleartext by postgres_exporter in postgresql VM charm, a medium vulnerability affecting postgresql-operator from Canonical. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-104055. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 5.3 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.