CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-1163

CVE-2026-1163 — Insufficient Session Expiration in parisneo/lollms

An insufficient session expiration vulnerability exists in the latest version of parisneo/lollms. The application fails to invalidate active sessions after a password reset, allowing an attacker to continue using an old session token. This issue arises due to the absence of logic to reject requests after a period of inactivity and the excessively long default session duration of 31 days. The vulnerability enables an attacker to maintain persistent access to a compromised account, even after the victim resets their password.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, @huntr_ai

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

parisneo

parisneo_lollms

CVSS base

4.1

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

parisneo lollms

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
4.1CVSS 3.0MEDIUMcvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-613

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /lollms.

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.